Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Strategic Relations Between Saudi Arabia And Iraq
Strategic, cooperative relationships between states in the Middle East have tended to be inconsistent and volatile - examples being the alliance between Egypt and Syria that coalesced into the short-lived United Arab Republic in 1958 and the shifting relationships between Saudi Arabia and Iraq . In fact, in Waltââ¬â¢s list of eighteen Middle Eastern regional alliances formed between 1955 and 1979, none lasted for longer than five years (Walt, 1987, p.150). In light of this heritage, it is therefore particularly remarkable that the most persistent regional arrangement to-date has been between Syria, a secular, Arab and predominantly Sunni state and Iran, a Persian, Shia theocracy. And the relationship has certainly been persistent, with theâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦President al-Assad of Syria and his inner circle are Alawites; a religious sect that broke from mainstream Shiââ¬â¢ism in the 9th century. As a member of a Shia minority running an otherwise predominantly Sunni state , it would seem natural to look to Iran for support. From Iranââ¬â¢s perspective too, when viewed though this sectarian prism, it would seem to be expedient to support a nominally Shia regime in order to prevent Syria becoming another member of the regional ââ¬ËSunni campââ¬â¢. In support of this analysis, Agha and Khalidi claim that ââ¬Å"the Shiite-Alawite connection did play an important part in the development of Syrian-Iranian relations and may in fact be seen as one of the main motors of the of the emerging alliance between the two countriesâ⬠(Agha and Khalidi, 1995, p.4). Others extend this idea of a ââ¬Ësectarian allegianceââ¬â¢ further, describing it as part of a ââ¬ËShia Crescentââ¬â¢ that encompasses not only Iran and Syria but also post-war Iraq and the increasingly significant Hezbollah movement in Lebanon. This approach clearly sees religion as a ââ¬Ëkey binding agentââ¬â¢ in this regional configuration. So is this a persuasive analysis? Certainly, sectarianism has played a significant role in the domestic political history of both nations. In Syria, as Horowitz explains ââ¬Å"ethnic politics is defined in confessional termsâ⬠(Horowitz, 2001, p.492) with the Baââ¬â¢athist coup of 1963 being followed by purges of Sunnis from the military and civil services until by 1969 ââ¬Å"the Alawi were left
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.